Tough call. I suspect that to those not in the know, #2 may almost pass for factory height, whereas #1 definitely has a lowered look to it. Generally I think the lower the better, but in this instance I think I'm leaning towards #2.
... or #1... lol, like I said - tough call :P
Please.... call me Josh
'76 D16A swap in progress
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
amifsud wrote:I'd say 2 as well. 1 is a little too low. Number 2 looks about how the front of mine looks with the sagging stock springs.
You have 70 series tires by the looks of it? Looking at it, your car looks pretty much the same height as mine, at least in the pictures I have it does. That's right, I keep a file on everybody's cars. :P
edit: I was just reading the BC Coilovers thread and your front is 5mm lower than mine, and my rear is 10mm lower, based on the measurements you posted. So with your 70 series tires (I'm assuming they are), it will look like #1 when you lower it to the equivalent of #2 on my car. Hopefully that makes sense.
Mike S always says they do a better job of filling the guard. I just prefer the wider profile of the 185/60, not to mention I'm going to need all the grip I can get with my new engine!
